Thursday, 15 December 2011

Greater use of project bank accounts in UK

Cash is king in the construction industry and the UK Cabinet Office recently announced £4bn to flow directly to SMEs through project bank accounts (PBAs) over the next 3 years.

http://www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/news/%C2%A34-billion-flow-directly-smes-through-government-construction-projects-and-new-construction-pip

All good stuff of course and would be nice to have a revolutionary approach to payment. Remember that NEC already has in place a Z clause for this, link below, the clause is half way down the useful downloads page

http://www.neccontract.com/about/ContractDownloads.asp

I wonder what if there is an appetite in the UK private sector and public/private sectors in other countries for this? I hope so......

Rob

Friday, 2 December 2011

Achieving cost certainty with NEC

A few times now I have heard people suggest that cost certainty is more likely achieved by using NEC3 ECC Option A than any of the other Options. Interesting. All Option A is at the end of the day is a pricing mechanism, this one happens to be lump sum. In the highly unlikely event that no compensation events arise, the lump sum agreed is that which is paid so I suppose cost certainty has been achieved. Whether this is a lower price paid than would have been obtained using Option C is debatable however my point is these are just finer points and surely the best way for clients to achieve 'cost certainty' is to act intelligently by having a good, clear scope of works with little change thereafter (ie know what you want); sensibly avoid, reduce or mitigate as much project risk as you can; sensibly allocate the residual risk left over (of course ensuring the contract matches this); surround yourself with sensible people; make sure the 'price' is realistic; and then press the go button......

So which do you think is likely to achieve cost certainty
1. Option A?
2. Option C?
3. The intelligent client?

Rob

Thursday, 17 November 2011

NEC questionnaire

Dear all,

Two senior lecturers in civil engineering at Leeds Metropolitan University have put together this questionnaire to research your experience of using NEC compared to other forms of contract. Your input would be most gratefully received.

Rob

Thursday, 20 October 2011

NEC student dissertation

Dear all,

Another student survey if you have a few minutes to spare please. In the student's own words....

I am undertaking a Masters' Degree in Surveying (Quantity Surveying and Construction Management route) at the College of Estate Management as part of my final dissertation and the Sir Ian Dixon Award for the Chartered Institute of Building; I am researching the question of whether the NEC3 contract has met its aim in delivering client satisfaction.

I am trying to understand and describe what client satisfaction looks like to a wide selection of major clients that use the NEC3 contracts.

I would be grateful if you would kindly complete the attached questionnaire. All information given will be treated with strict confidence and I will be happy to share a copy of the summary of results.
Thanks,
Rob

Monday, 26 September 2011

The Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act - NEC3 September 2011 Amendments

The UK’s Local Democracy, Economic Development and Construction Act 2009 has introduced amendments to the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (the ‘Construction Act’), requiring a number of changes to NEC3 contracts. The changes are published on the NEC web site for free download by users on the following link.

http://www.neccontract.com/amendments.asp

The amendments to the Construction Act apply to all construction contracts in England and Wales from 1 October and those in Scotland from 1 November. They are likely to apply to contracts in Northern Ireland in the future.

The resulting NEC3 changes are in two areas: adjudication and payment. In the Engineering and Construction Contract (ECC), Engineering and Construction Subcontract (ECS), Professional Service Contract (PSC) and Term Service Contract (TSC) this is effected through revisions to clause W2 and Y(UK)2.

An additional clause is provided in the short forms, namely the Engineering and Construction Short Contract, Engineering and Construction Short Subcontract and Term Service Short Contract. The changes are summarised below.

Changes to adjudication provisions

The provision allowing for correction of slips has been revised to comply with the new statutory requirements. This has affected the timing of the correction as well as the wording of what can be corrected.

It is now no longer permissible to allocate fees and expenses of an adjudication equally between the parties through the contract. The adjudicator must be given the right to allocate them. The Act has also fixed the timing of any payment due following an adjudication decision, which has required a further change.

Changes to payment provisions

Under ECC, ECS and TSC, a payment certificate and details of how the payment was calculated must be issued together and defined as a payment notice. If the project manager fails to give a payment notice, the contractor may give the notice. Under short forms and the PSC, there is no certificate so the contractor/consultant’s submission will constitute the payment notice.

In all forms, the timing of issue of the payment notice must be fixed as not later than 5 days after the payment due date. The amount stated in the payment notice must be paid unless a notice of intention to pay less is issued. The arrangement is superficially similar to the withholding notice, but terminology and timing are different.

As the Act now requires payment to be made for suspending performance for non-payment, the short forms have also been amended to include this as a compensation event to ensure the assessment is carried out as for other events.



Tuesday, 23 August 2011

NEC & BIM

A few people have asked 'is there going to be an NEC compliant BIM contract (or amends) in time'? The answer is at the moment there are no amends being drafted, nor do we see them being required. Of course things may change as BIM develops.

NEC has representation with the UK Governments' BIM implementation group where, amongst other things, the group is discussing liability, negligence, deliverables, copyright, IPR and so on. NEC will input into this group by monitoring/reviewing/advising and looking over the protocol the group is writing.

From my perspective and in simple terms, BIM is a design process based on a common platform. It it appears that BIM is in no way intended to change the current liabilities structure that we have - in time we may have integrated project insurance (IPI) but IPI isn't BIM and vice versa.

From an NEC perspective therefore, if such a process (protocol) is required then the requirements to work to this should rightly be in the Works Information (ECC) or the Scope (PSC). The biggest issue with BIM seems to be data supply and current thinking is that this could comfortably be accommodated through a mixture of key dates and sectional completion.

Rob

Student NEC research

Dear all,

Please spare a bit of time to complete the attached survey for a masters student doing a dissertation on NEC3 ECC Option C.

Many thanks,
Rob

www.surveymonkey.co.uk/nec3